<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
xmlns:rawvoice="http://www.rawvoice.com/rawvoiceRssModule/"
xmlns:googleplay="http://www.google.com/schemas/play-podcasts/1.0"

	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Studs, Natasha, and the Power of Sound</title>
	<atom:link href="/2009/02/studs-natasha-and-the-power-of-sound/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>/2009/02/studs-natasha-and-the-power-of-sound/</link>
	<description>THE BACKSTORY ON GREAT RADIO STORYTELLING</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 16 Mar 2015 17:48:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: will</title>
		<link>/2009/02/studs-natasha-and-the-power-of-sound/comment-page-1/#comment-1579</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[will]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jan 2012 02:55:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=316#comment-1579</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Anne Fernald is the person who said &quot;sound is like touch at a distance,&quot; in case anyone is wondering. It was in a radiolab episode (I think Musical Language).

now...

I LOVE the way this piece gets self-conscious about waxing philosophically - &quot;off the deep end&quot; &quot;pepped up&quot; &quot;loony&quot; &quot;drinking the koolaid&quot; - it&#039;s hard to get metaphysical without losing the skeptical side of your audience, and this piece flirts with skepticism in an endearing way.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Anne Fernald is the person who said &#8220;sound is like touch at a distance,&#8221; in case anyone is wondering. It was in a radiolab episode (I think Musical Language).</p>
<p>now&#8230;</p>
<p>I LOVE the way this piece gets self-conscious about waxing philosophically &#8211; &#8220;off the deep end&#8221; &#8220;pepped up&#8221; &#8220;loony&#8221; &#8220;drinking the koolaid&#8221; &#8211; it&#8217;s hard to get metaphysical without losing the skeptical side of your audience, and this piece flirts with skepticism in an endearing way.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jamie</title>
		<link>/2009/02/studs-natasha-and-the-power-of-sound/comment-page-1/#comment-19</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jamie]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2009 19:13:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=316#comment-19</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[OK, OK. I needed this. I needed to hear to remember. To hear this podcast to keeping going. To put everything into making sound come out simple and beautiful. Back to work...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OK, OK. I needed this. I needed to hear to remember. To hear this podcast to keeping going. To put everything into making sound come out simple and beautiful. Back to work&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
