<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
xmlns:rawvoice="http://www.rawvoice.com/rawvoiceRssModule/"
xmlns:googleplay="http://www.google.com/schemas/play-podcasts/1.0"

	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Swing Free</title>
	<atom:link href="/2009/09/swing-free/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>/2009/09/swing-free/</link>
	<description>THE BACKSTORY ON GREAT RADIO STORYTELLING</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 16 Mar 2015 17:48:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: Kerry</title>
		<link>/2009/09/swing-free/comment-page-1/#comment-64</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kerry]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Sep 2009 15:18:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=559#comment-64</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I agree that this is an interesting piece because of what it leaves out. I have to say I didn&#039;t really miss the sex sounds. I agree with the producer that I don&#039;t really want or need to hear grunting and moaning. Maybe some pillow talk would have accomplished the same purpose with more subtlety.

What I _did_ miss was more than one point of view. I realize that access might have been really difficult with a taboo subject like this, but I wanted to hear the inner voice of Maggie, Nadine&#039;s steady. And Maggie&#039;s husband. 

Maggie presents her relationship with Nadine as the intimacy that she lives for, but it was hard for me to believe in that intimacy because swinging sex doesn&#039;t actually sound very intimate (hedonistic yes, but intimate?). 

So, without those other voices, it&#039;s hard for me as a listener to really believe Maggie. She makes a big statement there at the top of the narrative arc, but there are no scenes to support what she says. So the relationship and the piece sound two dimensional.

Still, it&#039;s kind of a fascinating piece. I listened to it twice through, but I just felt empty afterwards - no satisfying connection.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree that this is an interesting piece because of what it leaves out. I have to say I didn&#8217;t really miss the sex sounds. I agree with the producer that I don&#8217;t really want or need to hear grunting and moaning. Maybe some pillow talk would have accomplished the same purpose with more subtlety.</p>
<p>What I _did_ miss was more than one point of view. I realize that access might have been really difficult with a taboo subject like this, but I wanted to hear the inner voice of Maggie, Nadine&#8217;s steady. And Maggie&#8217;s husband. </p>
<p>Maggie presents her relationship with Nadine as the intimacy that she lives for, but it was hard for me to believe in that intimacy because swinging sex doesn&#8217;t actually sound very intimate (hedonistic yes, but intimate?). </p>
<p>So, without those other voices, it&#8217;s hard for me as a listener to really believe Maggie. She makes a big statement there at the top of the narrative arc, but there are no scenes to support what she says. So the relationship and the piece sound two dimensional.</p>
<p>Still, it&#8217;s kind of a fascinating piece. I listened to it twice through, but I just felt empty afterwards &#8211; no satisfying connection.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
